This article is a reply to the article on the UC Ministries Blog titled: An Alien Gospel. Like many people that have been deceived by the modern church teaching on Genesis 6, the owner of the UC Ministries blog is no different. They teach and adhere to the false Sethite Theory, which state: Seth’s line was righteous (false), Cain’s line was evil (false), and they were not allowed to mix (false). That aside, there are some very misleading and outright false statements that appear on the UC Ministries blog.
“I find that almost always those who hold to this teaching do so because of an extra Biblical piece of literature called the BOOK OF ENOCH. Very rarely do people ever come to some of these conclusions simply on scripture alone.” – UC Ministries
This is a completely false statement. In fact, most people that I’ve encountered came to the belief that the sons of God were angels, long before they are introduced to the book of Enoch. Anyone that picks up a Bible without trying to twist meanings can clearly see that the phrase “sons of God” (b’nai ha Elohim – Hebrew) as used in the Old Testament only refers to angels.
The phrase also appears once in Aramaic and is found in the book of Daniel. It is through king Nebuchadnezzar that we learn that this “son of God” is an angel:
“He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God… Then Nebuchadnezzar spake, and said, Blessed be the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who hath sent his angel, and delivered his servants that trusted in him, and have changed the king’s word, and yielded their bodies, that they might not serve nor worship any god, except their own God.” – Daniel 3:25 & 28
There is some dispute as to whether the Hebrew article should be translated as “the” or “a” son of God, but Nebuchadnezzar clearly says that the fourth man in the fire is an angel. The Aramaic phrase used here is: bar Eloha (son of God). I challenge the write of the UC Ministries blog to post a single example from the Old Testament that uses bar Eloha or B’nai ha Elohim to refer to anything other than angels.
“The more I look into this theology the stranger its gets. The ramifications of such a theory as I will show has far-reaching consequences. Scripture is twisted and changed to conform to an alien gospel built upon bible codes, new age teachings, Egyptian hieroglyphics, astrological charts, alien revelations and wild leaps of fantasies.” – UC Ministries
This is 100% false. According to the previous statement, the book of Enoch was used. Both of these statements can’t be true since the Book of Enoch was widely used before the alien gospel was being preached as it is now. In fact, the alien gospel attempts to use Enoch and the Bible to validate itself, not the other way around. The mere mention of Bible codes shows the authors lack of critical thinking or even basic historical knowledge. The Book of Enoch and pretty much every other story on earth pertaining to Genesis 6 predates the Bible Code hysteria by thousands of years. In order to even accept this absurd statement, we must believe that the Bible Codes were widely in use during the 2nd Temple Period.
Egyptian hieroglyphics (false), astrological charts (false), and alien revelations (false) are all listed in the comment, but none f them have anything to do with the belief that the sons of God are angels. If it wasn’t so sad to see grown people making up this stuff and misleading people, it might actually be funny.
“There seems to be an almost unbelievable obsession with the idea that fallen angels are out to have sex with women. It never occurs to them for a moment that angels can’t produce the goods. Whilst we are quickly told that Angels can appear and even eat food. Eating is a long way from having the ability to reproduce and have children.” – UC Ministries
The actual assumption here is that angels CAN’T produce children with human women. The Bible says no such thing on any page in either the Old or New Testaments. It says the angels of God IN HEAVEN don’t get married (paraphrase). Not getting married does not = physically incapable of having sex. That’s a baseless church tradition.
“Those who hold to this theory are unable to realize that if mankind is the product of angelic interference, then man is absolved from his sin. Man can then be personified as the helpless victim rather than the perpetrator.” – UC Ministries
Those that hold this theory NEVER make the claim that mankind is the product of angelic interference. This single statement shows that the author has not put any actual study time into the subject and is speaking out of complete ignorance.
“In the world of the new age there are proponents of ideas that this world was seeded by aliens, and these aliens will soon come back to save the planet, But notice that if you tweak this new age philosophy by giving it a religious tone, you come up with the same message about the sons of God producing giants. It’s really the same message!!!” – UC Ministries
It’s sad to see someone teetering on the tip of truth, but doesn’t even realize that it is New Age that has transformed angels into aliens in order to avoid the Biblical implications of what is going on. It is the exact same message, but those of us that believe the angel view did not steal it from them. They stole it from the Bible and other past cultures. With that said, the part about aliens “seeding” the world is specifically New Age and nobody that I’ve encountered that holds the angel view believes the entire world and life was started by angels.
“It’s all about experimentation on humans and producing a hybrid being that is not quite human and not quite alien. Many of those who hold to these theories will produce articles in an attempt to debunk the new age message, yet all the while embracing a religious view that embraces it.” – UC Ministries
Another lie stemming from lack of research. The angel view is much older than the New Age version of the teaching. New Age embraces the Bible, not the other way around. The entire point of the flood was because there was tampering with genetics going on. Unfortunately, the authors brain won’t let them assemble all of the evidence into the truth that is clearly before his face. They have turned to the Sethite fable even though all evidence stacks up against it.
“The sad reality as you read through the columns of articles by those who hold to the fallen angel’s theory is that they do indeed elevate those forces onto an equal standing.” – UC Ministries
I’d love for the author to back this claim with a single link to a well known Christian author that even remotely elevates the fallen angels on equal standing with God or his forces. They are powerful, but not equal. This statement is 100% false and false on purpose.
“We are told quite clearly that the fallen angels who fell away from God were indeed locked up and imprisoned until the final judgment… But if they were locked up how could there be Giants afterwards?” – UC Ministries
Possibly one of the most unintelligent questions, even though I’m sure the author thinks its clever. He even quotes Jude 1:6, which refers to the angels that sinned being locked up. The author ASSUMES this refers to all angels. If they were familiar with their Bible, they’d be asking why Satan wasn’t locked up with the other angels that sinned. They’d also be asking why he isn’t locked up until Revelation 20:1-3? If the leader of the fallen angels wasn’t locked up for sin, it makes no sense to lock up the rest. There is clearly something else that Jude is referring to, but what could it be? If the author had done any actual research, they would know that this is the exact verse where Jude references the Book of Enoch. The book of Enoch is one of only a few Hebrew texts that reference fallen angels being bound for sexual sins. The Book of Jubilees mentions it as well.
“The term WATCHERS is used by the book of Enoch to describe angels.. However notice that in order to get around scripture, there has to be a long list of angelic rebellions to fill in the missing pieces. No where do we see such continuous rebellions occurring.” – UC Ministries
The book of Daniel (4:13 & 4:23) also uses the term Watcher to refer to angels, but the author doesn’t know that or intentionally fails to mention it in order to further mislead people about the angel theory. The author then misrepresents the theory by making a reference to multiple rebellions. These acts by the fallen angels were extensions of the initial rebellion, not new rebellions. When Satan killed off Job’s family, he didn’t rebel again, he was continuing his role as the angel that had already rebelled. Likewise, angels that had already fallen would attempt to wipe out creation by tampering with it.
“So that today anyone who has a genetic problem can be accused as being the product of some angelic molestation. This was recently posted by an advocate of this theory.” – UC Ministries
I agree that it is ridiculous to point out every genetic flaw as a sign of angelic involvement, but the author is specifically referring to people with six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot. While again, it is wrong to apply a blanket statement to this, at least the argument is Biblically based because the Bible mentions the hybrids having six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot.
“And there was yet a battle in Gath, where was a man of great stature, that had on every hand six fingers, and on every foot six toes, four and twenty in number; and he also was born to the giant.” – 2 Samuel 21:20
You’d think that someone that claims to have done their research would know that, but again, the author attempts to mislead people into believing it’s not based on scripture or that they have actually done their homework. Neither of which is true.
“But also that these people who they claim are Nephilim cannot be saved. For them there is no salvation, No grace and no redemption for them. If they die their lefts over bits become demons. They are therefore beyond the pale of God power to save. Is this the Gospel that Jesus shared? That one can only be saved providing that you are racially pure? Suddenly the issue becomes one of racial purity. Who among us can say that were are racially pure according to their theory? Can anyone then be saved?” – UC Ministries
Unlike Serpent Seed, the angel theory teaches that HUMANS can be saved and ANGELS cannot be saved. Christ did not become an angel human hybrid to save angel human hybrids. There is also no reference to a single hybrid even attempting to be saved. In addition to that, thinking someone is a hybrid and them actually being a hybrid are two different things. Either someone is a hybrid or they aren’t. If they believe in Christ, it doesn’t matter what anyone thinks. If they are human they are saved.
Then there is the nonsense mention of “racial purity” which is an outright lie. The theory is about HUMAN RACIAL purity, as in purely of the HUMAN RACE, not based on skin color or ethnicity as the writer is trying to imply. The author is deceiving his audience into believing that the angel theory is about race and not about being 100% human. You must be human to be saved. The author is welcome to show us in scripture where angels and demons can obtain salvation if they can find the verse to prove so.
“Suddenly we are introduced a planet called Rahab, Lucifer’s home planet, which they believe might be what the asteroid belt was. How do they come to that conclusion? Through Bible codes, which is another very unreliable method of divination of the scriptures.” – UC Ministries
Not all of us adhere to this belief as the author of this completely false article would have people believe. It’s a blanket statement that isn’t true in the least bit.
The rest of the article goes on to make more false blanket statements about angels hiding in the asteroid belt and then there is a crack taken at who I assume is L.A. Marzulli, even though the author of the article isn’t man or woman enough to even mention who they are referring to:
“However all of this lunacy presents another problem and that its indirectly attacks the nature and sovereignty of God. Now to show that is not just a coincidence. One writer who has published a book on the subjects tries to use a chess board to illustrate the different players… Here God is presented as the king piece, and Lucifer is the other king piece. Does the Bible present Lucifer as God’s equal? Then what of Jesus? He is presented as being a mere Knight on the board, and his counterpart on the other side and his equal is Beelzebub.” – UC Ministries
Here is one single fact that lays the argument to who the sons of God are to rest, if people choose to believe scripture:
“But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:” – John 1:12
The simple fact is that it is a belief in Christ as the Savior of mankind that gave us the “power to become the sons of God.” Unless the author is ready to say that Seth was a Christian, then the fact is, people were not who Genesis 6 is referring to when we see the phrase “sons of God”.
Your Reviews Are Needed
A lot of you have bought my books, As The Days of Noah Were, Serpent Seed: Debunked, and Religion and Relationship. I definitely appreciate it and would love to get your feedback. If you have read any of my books, please take a few minutes to post a review on Amazon. Your reviews help others decide whether or not they want to buy the book, which in turn supports the ministry. So please, please, please leave an Amazon review for any of my books. Thanks in advance for taking a few minutes out of your day to do that for me.
Upcoming Articles – Subscribe So You Don’t Miss Any
- Who Will Be In Hell?
- The Purpose Driven Deception
- Paganism In The Church: Traditions of Men – Part 3
- Arnold Murray and The Shepherd’s Chapel Deception – Part 3
- The Full Armor of God – Part 1
- Click Here To Subscribe
Free Bible Software
Support The Ministry – Buy A Book